Election Process- Entry #1

Jacqueline Palaza & Lena Boudreau

At both the Federalist and the Nationalist conventions this morning, the Constitutional Nominees identified themselves and shared why other party members should vote for them. While analyzing the motivational aspects of these officials, the following was recorded:

In the Federalist Party, the nominees running for governor are: Angelina, Emily, and Sarah. Angelina wants to create change by including all opinions, Emily believes that the division in our society can be overcome if we come together and push for change, and Sarah’s platform includes promoting gender equality.

In the Nationalist Party, the following nominees are running for governor: Adelaide, Rory, Mary, and Annabelle. Adelaide understands that it can be scary to have a voice, especially if one is shy. Her goal is to include others and help them break out of their shell, similar to what she is trying to do. Rory stands for unity and is a team player. She is also very open to ideas and is looking forward to amalgamate the amazing women in this program. Mary is dedicated to listening to other’s voices. She values voices that have a purpose to help better society. Lastly, Annabelle has wanted to be governor of our state since she was two years old.

While the Governor nominees had distinct goals, nominees for the other positions among both parties had similar viewpoints. In general, the Auditor of Accounts nominees focused on proving their reliability and organizational skills. Lieutenant Governors primarily centered their speeches around being advocates for change and leaders for the people. Treasurers were those who liked math, have strong organizational skills, and can complete work with accuracy. Attorney Generals were very interested in law and are intent on continuing to promote justice within the legal system. They also shared the common belief of standing up for what they believe in. Secretary of State nominees centered their speeches around what it means to be a good leader. This encompasses including all opinions of others and acting upon them.

While listening and observing a multitude of nomination speeches, common approaches emerged. Some delegates started their speech by making a joke or getting the collective group to laugh, while others directly referred to their resume and accomplishments. Across the board for all positions, nominees mentioned their organizational and leadership qualities. As listeners and observers, the most successful speeches were those that addressed the nominee’s unique qualities and interests, making them stand out from the other ladies standing beside them.